Open Knowledge Day in the media
On 17 October 2023, the 4th Open Knowledge Day, hosted by the Open Data and Intellectual Property Institute (ODIPI) and supported by Knowledge Rights 21, brought together experts to discuss the intersections between copyright and artificial intelligence and open science.
On 17 October 2023, the 4th Open Knowledge Day, hosted by the Open Data and Intellectual Property Institute (ODIPI) and supported by Knowledge Rights 21, brought together experts to discuss the intersections between copyright and artificial intelligence and open science.
Journalist Urška Henigman from Radio Slovenia – PRVI provided an in-depth contribution on the key dilemmas discussed at the Open Knowledge Day. Dr Maja Bogataj Jančič, ODIPI, and Ben White from Knowledge Rights 21 shared their views.
On 18 October, a workshop was held in conjunction with the Open Knowledge Day to specifically address the issues of copyright management in line with the principles of open science. The workshop was followed by a meeting of the KR21 Researchers Network for Central and South Eastern Europe.
We invite you to listen to the presentation in the link below.
ODIPI is organizing ERA KR21 Conference: Barriers and Incentives for Open Science in the Copyright Law that will take place on 2 December, 2024 at Hotel Four Points by Sheraton (Mons) in Ljubljana and also online.
The District Court of Hamburg ruled in the case of Kneschke v. LAION e.V. that LAION did not infringe the copyright of photographer Kneschke, as the use of his photograph was covered by the exception for text and data mining (TDM) for scientific purposes.
“Can copyright bring artificial intelligence to its knees? Which other circumstances may cause that the “making” of generative AI can dramatically change in the (near) future. This short paper presents potential challenges that copyright poses to the training of the machines on large amount of data. Different jurisdictions address these issues differently. In the USA the legality of these activities is tested in several court cases. Do gentlemen’s agreements and pragmatic symbiosis known from the “search engines business model” provide sufficient basis and/or incentive for the business model of “making” generative AI business model as well?