Maja Bogataj Jančič publishes a paper titled “Can AI be the Author of a copyright work?”
Dr Maja Bogataj Jančič has published a scientific paper entitled “Can AI be the Author of a copyright work?”.
In the paper, Dr Maja Bogataj Jančič addresses the questions of how copyright law can restrict the use of artificial intelligence and whether products generated by artificial intelligence can be protected by copyright. The article was published in a scientific monograph entitled Law and Artificial Intelligence: Issues of Ethics, Human Rights and Social Harm, edited by Dr Aleš Završnik and Dr Katja Simončič and published by the Institute of Criminology at the Faculty of Law, University of Ljubljana.
Dr Bogataj Jančič presented her findings at the symposium on Law in the Information Society, which took place on 17 March 2023 at the Faculty of Law, University of Ljubljana.
In June 2024, the Knowledge Rights 21 (KR21) network and Communia, published research findings in a publication entitled Copyright as an Access Right: Concretizing Positive Obligations for Rightholders to Ensure the Exercise of User Rights, which was authored by professors Christophe Geiger and Bernd Justin Jütte.
On Thursday, July 4, 2024, TV SLO 1 aired a new show Conversations about the Future with the subtitle Alternative Futures, in which three guests reflected on the dilemmas and opportunities of an increasingly digitized society. In addition to Dr. Maja Bogataj Jančič from ODIPI, were also anthropologists Dr. Dan Podjed from ZRC SAZU and computer engineer Dr. Blaž Zupan from the Faculty of Computer Science and Informatics UL.
In the first week of July 2024, the Summer Course on International Copyright Law and Policy took place in Amsterdam, which was also attended by the young researcher Laura Pipan from ODIPI.
On Friday, June 14, 2024, the second day of the Global Conference on AI and Human Rights took place at the Faculty of Law of the University of Ljubljana. Dr. Maja Bogataj Jančič gave a lecture as part of the 14th panel entitled AI and Intellectual Property: Revolution or Robbery?